Darryl Swint | Multimedia

Darryl Swint's thoughts on mobility, marketing, convenience and e-commerce

Photo by Darryl Swint | darrylswint.com®

The globalization of transportation was a significant catalyst upon our lives as consumers. It’s subsequent trappings and dangers are well known: cheaper imported goods available (with negative effects upon U.S. trade deficits); continued growth of an interrelated, global economy and a boon in international travel and commerce.

The old buzzword e-commerce, is in metamorphosis. Thanks to a germinating, ongoing merger of mobile smartphones, GPS-based, social media marketing and a tech-savvy consumer base comfortable with broadcasting its whims, movements and activity through satellite social media sites, the new economy is finally taking hold.

Recent efforts by Twitter, Google, Facebook, Apple, Square and Foursquare to connect and share locations, spending habits, activities and user reviews, enable businesses and marketers to take advantage of real-time marketing.

Remember the Minority Report chase scene in which the Tom Cruise character John Anderton’s transplanted eyes are recognized by a local Gap store, asking him about his most recent purchase? Theoretically, it’s no longer fiction.

Businesses with a social-media savvy branding/marketing strategy can advertise on social media sites, create event-related apps and badges and become event partners. The result? The ability to reach socially-conscious consumers in real time with discounts, ads, information and branded games — all for a targeted consumer base whose habits are well-documented.

Here’s an example:
Next year, the City of Houston hosts the NCAA Final Four. In the semi-finals, two teams win and two teams lose. A restaurant/bar owner who has created a Facebook profile can be “friended” or “liked” by local University A’s alumni group, or current (over 21) students. If University A wins or loses, the restaurant owner can send an update, Tweet, posting or challenge through social media to University A’s networked fans, offering a limited 10% discount on food and beverage with a scan-able bar code ad or by wearing team colors.

Let’s say University A loses. The dejected fans likely want nothing more than to sell their Finals tickets and get out of town. Maybe the restauranteur offers a 15-percent discount to keep them around a little longer.

Who doesn’t like a discount?

University A fans quickly relay the offer to fellow friends and fans and before long, the restaurant has increased both foot traffic and sales — all with a minimal advertising investment. And it is this nexus of technology, providers and consumers that has given way to yet another revenue stream and marketing/advertising opportunity.

THE SLIPPERY SLOPE
Though the applications of where this can lead are myriad, the main area of concern is disclosure. As consumers, do we really want an obvious profile of our spending habits, likes, dislikes, travels and tendencies available for advertisers to hawk products to our individual weaknesses?

Do we really want to be dehumanized to the point of conspicuous consumption? Do we want our brand loyalty to be used as an uncompensated de facto endorsement of a product, a good or a service? And to a more ominous extent, do we really want our exact whereabouts chronicled and recorded on a near 24/7 basis? Can we opt out of consumer tracking by one company or will we have to consciously opt out with each and every business or eBusiness transaction?

And if we opt in, will our personal information and spending profile be secure and resistant to hackers (especially considering Google and Twitter have experienced recent cyber attacks)? Will any of our favorite businesses have the ability to sell such information to the highest bidder? If so, will they need our consent or has that consent been ceded at opt-in?

HAVE CELL, WILL CHARGE

Another facet of eCommerce present for years in Africa and parts of Asia is using cell phones for credit transactions. A New York Times story examines how adaptation of this technology by Americans can impact small businesses and the fortunes of companies like Square, PayPal and VeriFone. Are we streaking toward a cashless society?

PATRIOT GAMES
After 9-11, the importance of security, privacy and disclosure changed in the realm of government and in society. The public outcry of ceding privacy rights to appease government officials was initially loud and swift. Then the objections waned. To date, there has never been a groundswell of grass-roots support or opposition to targeted micro-advertising and social media marketing.

The techies are the early adopters. But as the economy slowly improves and more companies seek higher profits with lower overhead, the herd of the business community will surely follow.

Losing time on the Dan Ryan Expressway

The Dan Ryan Expressway.

Chicago commuters are familiar with the minutes, hours and ultimately days annually lost while sitting in northbound rush hour traffic. A recently released report identified one stretch of the highway as the second-worst traffic bottleneck in the country.

Rush-hour Chicago traffic bottlenecks

Courtesy of INRIX

For my Chicago Explainer story on windycitizen.com, I examined the 10 worst traffic tie-up locations in the metro area. I also created a couple of graphics. One graphic pinpoints these 10 traffic nightmare areas while another shows just how much time can be lost in a Chicago commute.

Where is Chicago's coolest movie theater?

photo courtesy of the Lake Street Screening Room

The connection between cinema and Chicago is intrinsic. The strength and beauty of the city’s architecture — durable enough for those frozen winters — were celebrated on film. The Chicago Board of Trade took a star turn in The Untouchables. Wrigley Field was showcased in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. Aerial El acrobatics added excitement to the bullet-bending thriller Wanted, while a subterranean take on the Chicago Loop was featured in The Dark Knight.

Likewise, Chicago’s critical cinematic eye drew global respect as Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert became household names. Ebert now blogs about movies, but where he screens them — the Lake Street Screening Room — is one of the city’s hidden gems.

The facility is a 49-seat theater at 70th E. Lake St. and hosts Ebert as well as Second City’s other critical scribes reviewing the latest motion pictures. Only, the Screening Room isn’t just for the pros. You too can screen films at the facility for family and friends. Read all about it at my latest Chicago Explainer post.

Chicago is well-represented in Bravo's Top Chef Masters competition

There are plenty of reasons to love Chicago and one of them is the food. Whether you want authentic Mexican in Pilsen, flaming saganaki in Greektown, fresh vegetarian fare in Edgewater, soulful smothered chicken at Army & Lou’s on the South Side, an herb encrusted New York Strip in the Loop or the flavors and spices of Southeast Asia on Devon Avenue, Chicago feeds well.

So on the heels of last year’s win by Frontera Grill’s Rick Bayless, this year, five Chicago chefs — the most contestants from one city — are in the field of 22. For this week’s Chicago Explainer story, I created a culinary tale of the tape of Second City’s five local contestents.

David Burke, Marcus Samuelsson, Rick Tramonto, Tony Mantuano,
and Graham Elliot Bowles bring James Beard awards, Best New Chef awards and cuisines from Scandinavian and African fare, authentic regional Italian and Contemporary American to French fusion to the table.

Here’s a download-able version of the graphic (©Darryl Swint | windycitizen.com).

The Chicago chefs are also on Twitter:

Graham Elliot Bowles: http://twitter.com/GrahamElliot

David Burke: http://twitter.com/DBOnion

Marcus Samuelsson: http://twitter.com/MarcusCooks

Rick Tramonto: http://twitter.com/Cheftramonto

Tony Mantuano: http://twitter.com/tmantuano

Bravo TV’s Top Chef Masters: http://twitter.com/topchefmasters

Social media and the sports scene

I read an excellent article from WSJ.com contributor Jason Fry.

Fry posted on IU’s National Journalism Sports Center site about how the embrace of social media by athletes will affect sportswriters and their coverage. The discussion was part of Social Media week in New York (Feb. 1- Feb. 5).

The article caught my eye because the debate has been an issue of interest. In December 2008 while writing for stltoday.com’s Speaking Visually graphics blog, I briefly discussed the impact of Lance Armstrong’s embrace of Twitter. Armstrong, long a technology geek on and off the bike, began communicating directly with his fans through Twitter and encouraged his teammates and coach to join the micro-blogging service.

Last spring, after taking offense to an article blaming him for a rider uprising about safety, Armstrong reportedly boycotted the Giro D’Italia media last year, posting his post-race thoughts and analysis on Twitter. By the end of the race, some cycling journalists were quoting Armstrong’s tweets. Today, Armstrong has over 2.4 million followers while the NBA’s Shaquille O’Neal boasts 2.8 million followers.

Fry notes that the rage of Twitter and Facebook began four years ago — and now a new crop of collegiate star athletes will soon break into the public consciousness having used social media as easily a primary means of communication as they’ve used  their smartphones for voice calls.

Fry writes:

So where will that leave sportswriters?

For one thing, they will have to accept that they are no longer gatekeepers through which information must pass – reporting on a team will require not just time in the locker room, but also hours following athletes on Twitter, checking in on their fan pages, and watching their latest Ustream videos.

But that’s already happening – many sportswriters are on Twitter in part because the athletes and agents they cover are on it. As things evolve, I think sportswriters will be more free to let what athletes say through social media stand for itself. Pretty soon specifying that someone said something on Twitter will be as odd as specifying that it was said using a telephone.

The migration to social media by current sportswriters (and the new guard of journalists) likely will change the manner traditional interviews are conducted. While some athletes will use Twitter and Facebook as ways to reach out to fans, other, savvier athletes will expect beat writers and columnists to be just as comfortable using these mediums. Those beat writers and columnists must be skilled in navigating the athlete’s tweets to construct a compelling story — even if the interview unfolds 140 words at a time.

NFL helmet logos redesigned at Fast Company

Just over one year ago on the P-D Graphics blog Speaking Visually, I briefly wrote about and linked to a NYT John Branch story about the evolution of the Super Bowl logo. Through the years, the logo (as with all NFL branding) went from somewhat of an afterthought to a primary marketing feature associated with perhaps the biggest game franchise in team sports.

This year, I’ve come across Ken Carbone’s Fast Company blog where he redesigns what he calls “the worst NFL helmet graphics. Carbone gives credit to what he considers the best NFL helmet logos: Dallas, St. Louis, Philadelphia and Cincinnati.

But it’s interesting to see what Carbone does with sketches and renderings of Tampa Bay, Washington and New England’s helmet logos. The Washington prototype is impressive: a nod to the features on its throwback helmet from the mid-to-late 1960s.

Carbone’s Fast Company colleague Cliff Kuang gets a primer on this year’s Super Bowl XLIV logo, designed by Attik, an English communications firm and division of Japanese ad firm Dentsu.

Chicago Explainer: How does Illinois certify its election results?

In the GOP gubernatorial primary between State Sen. Kirk Dillard of Hinsdale, Ill. (left) and State Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington, Ill. (right). Brady held a lead of fewer than 500 votes as of Thursday.

There’s nothing quite like Illinois politics.

Tuesday’s Election Day turnout was much lower than expected, but three statewide races (the Democratic and GOP governor’s race primaries and the state comptroller race) were so close they are currently decided by less than one vote per precinct. Chicago’s Board of Election Commissioners abides by a series of deadlines for counting ballots, ultimately leading up to a Feb. 23 certification date. I’ve written about how Illinois counts its votes on the Chicago Explainer blog at windycitizen.com.

New mobile devices change the game

Nexus One. The rumored Apple tablet. Droid. Netbooks. iPhone 3G.

It’s an amazing time from a technological point of view. The exchange of information and ideas is being revised and adapted to new technologies. Media in particular, having taken their share of lumps over the past two years, have mobile and possibly tablet-formats on which to disseminate, host conversations, and even sell advertising.

Social media, in less than two years has become a new tool for media to reach readers, sources and newsmakers in real time. Twitter is often the first conduit of media information, hearkening back to the teletype and wire cables of yesteryear. Everyone may not have a laptop, but nearly everyone does have a smartphone.

On another note, I’ve made career choices that will bring me closer to what I want to do (and allow me to do it). It’s a new year. Both the present and the future are full of opportunity.

Thoughts on the SND Chicago meetup

I had a great time at the 05.16 SND-Chicago meetup. It’s great to discuss innovation possibilities in multimedia with a diverse range of journalists, marketers and programmers. And it’s always great to see classmates from grad school and the Detroit/Munster Monsters crew. Everyone in the room got it: old model – information business. new model – custom information AND delivery system business. How do you get the requested info into the eyes, ears and thoughts of your audience? Any way they want it. More to come …

An official response to the City Beat article

This is my final response addressing the City Beat interview in which I feel I am grossly misrepresented and misquoted.

Over the course of the past two days, I’ve exchanged messages with David Rolland, editor of City Beat. (Read the exchanges here.) I requested a correction of my quotes in the “You’re My Obsession” story written by Stacey Tolbert. Mr. Rolland said that because he had no access to the original story notes, he could not make changes beyond asking me to identify “problem” words he would eliminate and then add an editor’s note saying I feel I was both misrepresented and misquoted in the article. I chose not to identify  “problem words” because I take issue with my interview in its entirety. Thus, Mr. Rolland did not change the story but did insert a statement reflecting my objection to how I’m depicted in the story.

Please note that I also have the written support and endorsement of Mrs. Tolbert who wrote the article. Mrs. Tolbert’s comments can be found here.

I responded to Mr. Rolland by saying he could handle the situation as he sees fit, including making no change at all. Short of a retraction or correction, the story would still remain in its original form, misrepresenting who I am, depicting me as a chauvinist, and misquoting my comments. It’s the old adage about the “gotcha” headline on the front page in 100 pt. type, while the correction or retraction the next day is buried on A2 in 9.5 pt. type.

For the record, here is my edit of my comments. This edit reflects my actual comments and addresses the topics raised in the article by Mrs. Tolbert as well as the other six interviewees in the article. It is possible the City Beat article has harmed my reputation and my career. I am thankful that colleagues and the many people with whom I’ve worked in my career know the depiction of me in the City Beat article is inaccurate.

St. Louis-based journalist Darryl Swint agrees with Evers and Hall in that men notice breasts because they are an obvious symbol of femininity and represent complex roles.

“Studies show men are more visually stimulated than women,” Swint said. “Men’s interest in female breasts reflects a dual symbolism.
“When viewed in a sexual sense, it generates a response of male attractiveness to female sexuality. When breasts are viewed in a maternal sense, it reflects the powerful symbol of women as givers of life.”

Addressing the role of the Janet Jackson Super Bowl debacle in the breast debate, Swint believes a historical double-standard in media exists within the dual symbolism of female breasts. The depiction of bare breasts of women of color has long been published and broadcast — particularly of women in other cultures. At the same time, publishing or broadcasting of a fully exposed white female breast in mass media is unconscionable, Swint said, agreeing with Evers that visible nipples are taboo in American media.

“Janet Jackson’s three-second exposed breast was over-hyped by media and politicos,” Swint said. “Most men watching the show weren’t complaining.

“The furor did not originate with them. It originated elsewhere. And the furor was mostly directed at Jackson and not at Justin Timberlake, who was the real cause of her exposure.”

I asked Swint if Jackson had instead been Madonna or Britney Spears, would the reaction have been the same?

“No,” he replied. “I think it would have been treated as a genuine mistake if it happened to Britney and debated as a statement of empowerment if Madonna had done it. She has been known to challenge and reject societal beliefs on who a woman is and what a woman does.

“I doubt either would have received the amount of criticism about indecency leveled at Jackson.”